Weblog
Monday, 08 June 2009
-
The Kid Meltdown Alert System
As Megan graduated from high school two weekends ago, I have naturally been inclined to contemplate the last 17 years and 9 months through the prism of my parental experience. Parenting, especially parenting an independent, strong willed teenager, is a grand yet humbling endeavor. It was last night that led to me thinking about how I have strategized my responses to Megan's, let's say, "outbursts". I could say temper tantrums, however that conjures images of a child lying face down on the floor, legs kicking and arms pounding. She hasn't done that in at least three or four weeks.
A strategy is needed. Do not be fooled; we parents cannot react to childhood bouts of temporary insanity willy nilly. Looking back, and in the full spirt of Swine Flu awareness, I believe a six phase alert system, similar to the WHO's Pandemic Alert System, has been my guide over the years. I may be tucking it away for some time now, but my lovely wife Cathy is in her third month and I fully expect to dust off the Kid Meltdown Alert System (KMAS) again. The KMAS is easy to use and applies to kids of all ages, though I have found it exceptionally useful over the last five years.
Phase 1 - General pouting and discontent are evident in the host kid. This is common, cannot be cured, and poses no immediate threat of wider outbreak. No response is necessary.
Phase 2 - Some vocalization and physical demonstration is occurring in the form of annoyed tones and eye rolling. Basic preparedness is advised in the form of issuance of general warnings. Plans should be reviewed for Phase 3.
Phase 3 - Recognizable cases of disrespect and backtalk are occurring. Short periods of isolation are recommended.
Phase 4 - Cases are growing exponentially and severe cases are common. Cases are efficiently passing to others. Long periods of isolation are necessary and plans for the significant curtailing of social activities must be formed. Additionally, mildly painful, localized procedures may be required for the original host.
Phase 5 - Meltdown is imminent. Responses taken in the first four phases have been inadequate and all social activities must be immediately curtailed. Additional responses, including worst-case responses such martial law and complete lockdown must be planned for and implementation must be ready to commence on a second's notice.
Phase 6 - Meltdown is occurring. You have failed to contain the spread and you have now likely become infected.With plenty of preparation and the use of this handy system, I have found that we can all stay prepared.
Thursday, 16 October 2008
-
A Little Fun with the Presidential Election
Good to see both candidates poking a little fun at each other. Though, while Senator Obama showed plenty of humility and self deprecation, Senator McCain was in full attack mode with not a single line at his own expense. Sorry John, he is funnier than you, too. By the way, ignore the last two minutes of silliness in the McCain video - this is the only version I could find at the moment.
Sunday, 03 August 2008
-
The Sad Fate of John McCain
It seems that anyone closely watching the Presidential race has to be a bit saddened and bewildered by the Senator from Arizona. It was just eight short years ago that John McCain was the "maverick straight talker" who took on George W. Bush, he chosen by the GOP elite for coronation, and was derailed only by Karl Rove's slime-filled attacks on his patriotism. How is it, we should ask, that McCain turned into the shallow eunuch we see today. McCain toes the right-wing line on every major issue (and 99% of the minor ones) and has positioned himself out in front on most in a clear run to the right and an attempt to woo the party's extremists who have never quite trusted him.
McCain has possibly given himself a better shot at a win in November by coddling up to the far right. He has certainly made fund raising easier by dancing with the same GOP "bundlers" who paved Bush's way to the White House, but will his possible success (though still unlikely) come at the cost of his soul and reputation as a pragmatic dealmaker who can cross the aisle of the Senate to get things done?
One need only look at McCain's list of staggering flips: the War in Iraq, offshore oil drilling, negative campaigning, lobbyist dollars. You get an idea of how Washington's last honest man became just another politician. However, an even more chilling picture of McCain should be painted of McCain for those often hypocritical GOP voters who call themselves "family values" voters.- McCain's divorce is forbidden by most Christian churches; remarriage is considered an act of adultry in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church. McCain admits that it was his own adultry that broke up his first marriage.
- McCain is an Episcopalian (self declared as such through his entire Congressional career) who conveniently declared himself to be a Baptist in South Carolina, despite the fact that he has never been baptised.
- McCain's voting record has been less than family friendly.
- He voted against a bankruptcy bill that would have exempted familes that file for bankruptcy due to catastrophic medical expenses. (S 420, Vote 16, 3/7/01)
- He voted against a patient's "bill of rights" in 1998 and 1999 that would have provided some protection to families that have medical claims denied by insurers with little or no cause. (CQ, Senate Vote #73, 4/2/98; Senate Vote #182, 6/22/99)
- He voted against expanding the SCHIP to cover more uninsured children, a move that found McCain even in the minority in his own party, though locked hand in hand, yet again, with George W. Bush.
- McCain's divorce is forbidden by most Christian churches; remarriage is considered an act of adultry in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church. McCain admits that it was his own adultry that broke up his first marriage.
Thursday, 27 March 2008
-
What is it about Hillary Clinton's Supporters?
It is hard to like a lot of Hillary Clinton's supporters. I am not sure that I have ever encountered such a shrill group of angry, arrogant, paranoid buffons outside of the Christian far-right. It is a more apt comparison than one might think. Clinton's supporters are evangelically sure of the righteousness of their cause and their distaste for those who offend them (Barack Obama's supporters in this case). Their defenses of Mrs. Clinton often border on hysterics and many slide into nonsense. Many Clinton supporters now purport that as many as 30% of Obama's votes are from Republicans attempting to give John Mccain an easier candidate to beat; this despite the fact that most national polls show Obama running stronger against Mccain than Clinton. But I suppose that those same people are lying to pollsters too --there's that "vast right wing conspiracy", again. A large number of Mrs. Clinton's supporters seem to come from the older, 70's style liberal wing of the Democratic party. These are the 1960's hippie baby-boomers that elected Carter and didn't become Reagan Democrats. We know about the angry right. Here is the angry left.
There is another religious comparison that rings true. I have seen, again and again, supporters of Mrs. Clinton wonder aloud how so many people could be "taken" by Obama's "words". There exists the implication that Obama's supporters are suffering from the same mass delusion that atheists assert Christians to be suffering from. Obama made a pointed remark a few weeks ago that Clinton's camp is not attacking him, but directly attacking those who vote for him -- over 13 million ordinary Americans. It rings true and leaves you to wonder how much Mrs. Clinton and her supporters truly believe in the democratic process.
Tuesday, 25 March 2008
-

Currently Reading
Do Hard Things: A Teenage Rebellion Against Low Expectations
By Alex Harris, Brett Harris
see relatedKid Myths and War Lies
Do Hard Things: Ignore Social Myths and Get to Know a Real Kid
I was provided with a copy of this book a couple weeks ago by a friend who thought I might find it interesting from a religious perspective and the perspective of the parent of a teen. The book is getting a lot of advance buzz in churches, youth groups, etc. and it's precocious authors have become heroes to the "society is going to hell because of kids these days" types who have certainly already made this an Amazon pre-order bestseller and will set the blogosphere afire with impassioned pleas for all teens to read it and be saved from their apathy and sloth.
I don't question the authors' heart, faith or intentions. I think it could be an inspirational read for anyone (regardless of age) who may feel he or she isn't trying to live up to his or her fullest potential or that life has been lived in an underwhelming manner due to low expectations. The problem I have is the assumption by the authors and the vocal proponents that the vast majority of kids are lazy, entitled and uncaring. I don't believe that the vast majority of teens need a call to service or, for that matter, service in God's name. The many myths about Generation Y that abound today are not backed up by the facts. Actual polling data shows teens and young adults more politically involved (look at their voting numbers in this year's primaries!), more socially aware, less aimlessly materialistic (a teens material desires today are more likely to gravitate to a productivity tool such as an iPhone or some other gadget than expensive jeans) and more serious about school (they graduate and attend college at the highest rates ever) than young people in generations. Yes they are self-centered; most teens (most people, in fact) are and always have been. Today's teens simply have more technology with which to show themselves off to the world. The YouTube Generation is more the product of an unprecedented ease with technology than a heightened sense of "look at me". They are, finally, more religious than any generation since World War II. Simply put, most of today's teens do not need this book to tell them what they already know. But many adults, unfortunately, want to use it as an imprimatur of their mistaken beliefs and a sign that someone is trying to help kids save themselves from themselves.
If you Still Think that the Bush Administration Didn't Lie About Iraq
The PBS series Frontline has a history of producing great, but little known, exposes. This weeks Bush's War is no exception. If you refuse to recognize the tonnage of evidence that shows the Bush Administration built the case to invade Iraq on a foundation of deceit then you should consider checking out this two-part series with an open mind (if you are capable of having one). Based on interviews with those who were there, the series features evidence of a litany of moves that show the Administration had Iraq in mind during the very hours following 9/11 and sought only to make a connection between that day and Iraq whether the intelligence backed it up or not.
We hear of former Asst. Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz making the case that an Iraq connection must be made during the first White House meeting on 9/11, despite the CIA's quick identification of Osama Bin Laden and Al Queda as the responsible party.
We see multiple confirmations of the fact that hijacker Mohammed Atta never met with an Iraqi agent in Prague (the FBI had him confirmed in Miami at the time) yet Dick Cheney continues to relay this as fact even two years after confirmation otherwise.
Not to mention the voluminous stories of how the Administration botched the war's execution from the start -- flatly ignoring Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Eric Shinseki's troop need estimates and being, of course, proven tragically wrong by the current "surge" and now 4000+ dead. How they have mocked International treaties such as the Geneva Convention over the protest of lifelong warriors such as Colin Powell. Or how they have, as we know, demanded the Government be given unprecedented power to spy on US Citizens within our borders.
If you have not already chugged the Bush Kool-Aid, you will find yourself growing angrier with every minute of Bush's War. At the same time, you may feel a growing sense of relief that the clock is winding down on one of the most destructive Presidencies in U.S. history.
- browse entries:
- older »
About Me
-
I have a beautiful wife, Cathy, and an amazing daughter, Megan.


